Sure, we had some good times -- November 4 comes to mind -- but I think it's time we part ways, forever.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7060/b7060021b88bcaec4381c42100893241d133c27d" alt=""
Yet another in a long series of diversions in an attempt to avoid responsibility
Anyway, there are many satisfying words to describe a group of like-minded people: set, coterie, cadre, junta, posse comitatus, entourage.** These are all great. But just consider using clique every once in a while. It's worth it.
* In about 1999, the Chemical Brothers briefly tricked me into thinking electronic dance music could be cool. Deal with it.
** I sent my wife (Baby) a preview of this post, and she offered a couple suggestions for clique synonyms, leading to this exchange:
lazlo1979: why are there so many french words for this?
babyhouseman2: guess
lazlo1979: courtiers
lazlo1979: fucking courtisans again
babyhouseman2: france was run for like 1000 years as a big popularity contest
babyhouseman2: and then all the cool kids got their heads cut off
lazlo1979: that's brilliant
lazlo1979: you're better than kate beaton
Oh come, Desire of nations, bindIn one the hearts of all mankind;Oh, bid our sad divisions cease,And be yourself the King of Peace;Rejoice! Rejoice! EmmanuelShall come to you, Oh Israel!
... the lead rapper's acumen is put into question when he says "these three words mean you're gettin' busy: 'Whoomp, there it is'." That is clearly 4 words, as appearing on the album cover.And no less an authority than esteemed municipal blogger Craig (not to be confused with Semprini, presumably the name of an evil Italian marionette) raises some interesting questions about quality control and epistemological coherence in pop songs:
... Was there, at some point, any internal discussion regarding how many words are actually in the phrase "Whoomp there it is?"
These four words are what it’s all about… I just don’t know.
I was actually asking why foxen had changed and fox had not. More specifically, what I was getting at is how fox seems to have survived the Great Vowel Shift that affected almost every Middle English word. Usually, orthographic or phonemic analogy ensures that related words remain relatively close in spelling and pronunciation, but my guess is that fox was a common enough word that it escaped the shift through consistent usage. Foxen, however, remained a word limited to the argot of hunters and early naturalists. It would have been used more rarely, and thus subject to the vowel shift. Perhaps the voiceless /v/ simply worked better with the post-vowel-shift Early Modern /u/ (using the principle of least effort), just as the voiced /f/ worked with the Middle English /ō/.
In summary, Mr. elcaballo -- if, as Thomas Carlyle stated, language is the flesh-garment of thought, you are the Buffalo Bill of linguistics.
My "unacceptable" rating for UGGs applies to the Mukluks doubly. Not only are they hideous and undoubtedly seasonally inappropriate anywhere in the continental US, but they are made from foxes and seals and shit.
But it's really not the interactions in the lab that make me loathe college students. Mainly it's that they're a bunch of poseur douchebags. When I was in college, mainstream fashion was boring enough that you couldn't tell who was trying to look cool and who didn't care about their clothes. This is a typical college student in 2000:
Nowadays, fashion is actually interesting. However, this also makes it possible to completely overdo it and look like a dipshit. I took this picture outside my building yesterday:
Damned kids. Actually part of the problem is the fact that I moved from LA to Austin -- so I saw some really hideous trends come and go (e.g. UGGs with tights. Apologies to people that looks good on, but understand that you could probably wear anything if you can pull that off) and then moved in time to watch them come and (hopefully) go in another fashion market. The students who aren't trying too hard are usually wearing sweats 24 hours a day, which is only slightly less objectionable.
*Isn't printing out PowerPoint presentations kind of retarded? In MY day, we had course packets, and by God, we liked them. Stop wasting my paper. You're barely going to remember anything two years after you graduate, and taking proper notes is more likely to help you on a final anyway.
Yet he cannot be fired. I generally have no interest in firing anybody. I would rather find something else for them to do, unless they did something unethical, but Mustafa has been reassigned repeatedly and shown himself to be worthless as an employee everywhere he goes. Since he and I currently share an office (just for now, thankfully), I'm aware of his daily activities. Here is a typical day for Mustafa:
- show up a bit late
- translate some documents into Nepali (I think he has a side job)
- noisily eat a persimmon or two (I have to put on headphones and listen to music at this point)
- talk to his wife on the phone
- talk to various laborers working on his house
- confuse the hell out of undergraduates asking him questions about the computer lab next door
- arrange the housing of Nepalese refugees via phone
- take down some incorrect phone messages for me
- leave early
He is a good person, but a terrible, terrible employee. Every day, I hope he'll announce that he's retiring. My administrator says she's seen too many people like Mustafa to harbor any illusions that he won't hold on until the bitter end. He's going to be here until he is physically incapable of work -- and that's what makes a lifelong state employee.